Perfectly good goal in law. The comments on twitter and social media are insane!!
From a neutral , which opponent was impacted?It’s not a perfectly good goal in law. There’s no way in that position that Rashford isn’t interfering with an opponent.
How has he interfered with an opponent?It’s not a perfectly good goal in law. There’s no way in that position that Rashford isn’t interfering with an opponent.
Which part of law is that kes?Must confess I'm struggling to see how the flag was overruled. Rashford's offside position clearly gives him/Utd an advantage...
The Man City defender cannot run directly towards the ball because Rashford is in front of him and runs across him within a foot of the ball. Rashford has effected his opponent.How has he interfered with an opponent?
Without a shadow of a doubtThe Man City defender cannot run directly towards the ball because Rashford is in front of him and runs across him within a foot of the ball. Rashford has effectec his opponent.
Not a good enough answerThe smart defender runs into Rashford to trigger the offside offence. The players will learn.
Which part of law is that kes?