You've nailed it.
He is either a TA occupant or he isn't. That rules out a caution for the manager as we know who the offender is and he either leaves because he isn't allowed to be in the TA or he can stay because he is a TA occupant and has only been cautioned.
We've also got the definition of a quick free kick.
"A free kick taken (with the referee’s permission) very quickly after play was stopped"
Given all that happens between play stopping I can hardly say it sounds like a quick free kick. And where there is cautioning procedure play must be...
What about a thank you?
I think this might have come about from referees confronting observers after receiving a report with a lower mark than they think they should have gotten .
If the Handball stops a promising attack two caution able offences occur sequentially. So it would be 2 yellow cards, 1 for simulation and 1 for stopping a promising attack by handball.
Which I think is what @Viridis1886 is getting at.
This probably should be a dissent caution, not unsporting behaviour, and as you are this side of the border also a sin bin.
Persistent minor protesting, excessive appealing is all done as a form of dissent (to you not giving a foul throw) and...
I think it would only get tricky if there is SPA is handball. Deliberate handball is not a caution offence.
Essentially, as one says the better restart is direct so you "play advantage", penalise the handball for the free kick but still caution the simulation as you would "go back" and caution...
Yes, was meaning to dig it all back up again just pointing out that is what IFAB said.
Counter points are valid and agreed with, especially an incapacitated ref, as the ARs won't/may not have a whistle to stop play in the event of a foul if the game is continuing under them.
A bizarre rule...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.