Recent content by Viridis1886

I think there might be this time! @FB123

I think that reference is for holding. For that to be the case for a challenge there would need to be a continuation of the fouling offence beyond the initial contact. Also worth noting that if the offence is on the line, then they are counted as inside the penalty area. In real time and...

But they probably won't show the bits that are the most frustrating, the ones that show the true behaviour of some players, or the reasons why some folks decide to shelve the whistle.

You've clearly not seen my shoes. I can't take my eyes off the and no one else can either! https://refchat.co.uk/threads/refs-in-trainers.23293/post-250445

Well that took a dark turn!

I was told aim for your hand at about ear height, so in effect just a bit up from parallel.

They released the audio. Some of the audio.

"head mounted" so I'm hoping for something like this...

Second caution for dissent?

It doesn't change the seriousness of the incident, but the CAR was 22 rather than a minor.

The foundation on which Refchat is based on! 😂

I think we can reference enough data that simply being old doesn't make you good. Dear lord I wish it was the case!

A not too dissimilar thing happened on the last game of the season with Plymouth Argyle v Scunthorpe to determine relegation. Keeper claimed ball, but took an injury in doing so. Indicated an injury and went to throw the ball out and went to ground. Scunthorpe player intercepted it and then...

My assumption is that from the angle they the ref is at (close to behind the player) he could see that, if it hadn't been handled by the keeper, it was going into the goal. In which case a goal was denied.

The white line is definitely worth zooming in and following off into the distance! 🤣