Immediately means without delay, so if following the contact the attacker next tries to score and succeeds then it should be pulled back. Two touches sounds like an attacker trying to shoot immediately rather than waiting/looking for other options.
I think most get it done at a pharmacy, from looking at past threads.
The 'on the day' document says 'A Pharmacist is able to take your blood pressure reading, but the form MUST still be authenticated as above.'
I'm not sure what's happening exactly because previously I was advised the selection events would only be for referees who have at least 1 year's experience on the WNL.
Something like:
Fitness assessment failed = 3WAR (WNL assistant only)
Fitness assessment passed = 3W, and invited to...
Webb has made clear that VAR should have intervened on that. As for why not, fouls are a subjective decision so there is always a chance for error even on a video check.
The clip of this has 2.7M views on X from the match broadcaster TNT. For comparison, the touchline arguments between Klopp and Salah has 1.5M views on the same account. It has been a focal point on all coverage I have seen for this match.
Not that it's a great metric because if Taylor had...
Clip is at 1:37
The clearest camera angle is not in the video but put a couple of stills above from BBC coverage. I think UK viewers can see it here from 0:28.
Pundits on Sportscene did not like this SFP one bit and said it was a C&O error due to winning the ball. I think it's a great...
Taylor made a serious error in not ensuring Areola was aware of the advantage that had been given, but then made an even worse one by deliberately preventing what would have almost certainly been a goal and a legitimate one. That is not something we can do as referees. 'Play to the whistle' is...
I don't understand why the Birmingham FA brought a charge of threatening behaviour against a match official, and not simply a charge of misconduct for improper behaviour / bringing the game into disrepute contrary to rule E3.1.
I could not care less. As match officials we all put our duty first. That should not be questioned and no club should assume any legitimacy to challenge appointments.
Not sure this would achieve the desired effect as players would simply act injured for longer, make sure they had treatment, whatever needed to make it appear genuine.
Welcome to the forum. For professional matches you should post in the 'As Seen On TV' subforum.
The 'clear and obvious' threshold only applies to VAR checks. Both of these fouls were awarded by the on-field referee so 'clear and obvious' is not a factor. And when you say 'soft' unless you mean...
Referees not following the laws always risks causing difficulties for future refs by emboldening teams to challenge decisions for reasons not based in the laws. This example is at the bottom end of the scale for sure but we shouldn't label referees 'robots' if they would rather apply law...
I said 'in a more contentious circumstance' i.e. not 13-0. At what margin exactly do you take it upon yourself to ignore an obvious red card? This undermines future refs because teams will come to expect no sending off depending on their differing opinions of the situation rather than what the...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.