Search results

Well done...RC without a doubt .... violent conduct even against a team-mate....

Game on Saturday.. OA ..... Cup match on Sunday U18... with extra time or/then penalties...... with the prospect of rain looming ... oh deep joy.

I cannot get a pair black boots, i've tried everywhere (size 11) best I could manage is a black pair but the heels are blue my own fault really i'm not paying silly money for top range pair.......

I am not wrong here.... if the player knew it was indirect.... but he didn't ... i digress...(yes ok i know YC for me, note to self - read post properly-) i blame the missus she rabbiting about damn shopping tomorrow..

But that would never happen with a defender and we both know that.....

The original post states : " Attacker not realising it is indirect takes the kick quickly and shoots" so that is illegal as it should be INDIRECT as the OP stated.... so what would be your course of action on that scenairo alone ? Forget this rubbish about having a shot hoping for a rebound...

Brought it back for retake as it was indirect...... as soon as he has his shot, the ref should blow i don't think any player would just shoot hoping for a deflection... why would i punish the defender when the original shot was illegal

DISAGREE... i have never had a player " have a shot" hoping for a deflection.... have always passed to a team-mate, within a few yards

Seeing as it was an INDIRECT free kick..and not a direct free kick....... i would have brought the play back for a retake......no action toward the defender ..... I as the referee would have blown straight away as the player shot on goal..... indicating it should be indirect.

You must have been here on a 10 year drought, its been bloody awful with the bad weather coming over from the Atlantic and dropping its guts here, but i think the local councils s*** themselves and instigate a blanket ban on all their pitches when i know for a fact the one round the corner from...

Me go on strike never....... actually i might start something here but IMO i personally would not go on strike... don't see the point.... i always thought we referees are more intelligent than that... rise above adversity and all that.... the best course of action would be to boycott the teams...

Now had confirmation Sunday's match is now definately postponed....... so the wife says we can go shopping in Preston on Saturday and "pop" into Manchester on Sunday.......... oh ffs....

All football postponed this weekend , apart from private pitches and 3G, my Sunday match has been rescheduled to another pitch subject to an 8 a.m. inspection by groundsman (school pitch) but even then i have to do a pitch inspection..... so nothing definate..... yet :-( UPDATE....Game...

The battery issue is the only thing stopping me buying a spintso, really! only lasts 12 months..... been using an RFT 100 now for four years and not changed the battery.... now sod's law will kick in and any week now it will need replacing.......

I agree with you......... that important word you are looking for is "intent"

OP stated.... " A maroon player inside the blues half is under pressure and can only really play the ball backwards towards his deep defence. He does so but hits it hard enough for the ball to go all the way back to the keeper." Nothing deliberate in passing back to the keeper there.... is...

Agree with you here :-(

This conversation is going one step forward and two steps backward, keep throwing in these different "what if's" bored,bored,bored...... for that reason .... i am out........

If its foul and abusive as stated in the laws of the game too f****** right. I bet players in your matches say " oh look guys we can swear and be abusive to each other and our opponents but not at him"

:-) :-) you are not alone those 22 players on the pitch lost the plot as soon as they put their kit on