Search results

Yeah, I'd say a harmonica is a type of whistle

Surely 'including from a free kick' doesn't mean 'excluding other restarts (goal kicks)'? I thought the words 'including from a free kick' was just clarification (an example of what is considered a trick) and the law would be the same without these words? I still feel the law as it's written...

So, it's a retake until the matter is "discussed" by the IFAB. Couldn't they just conference call each other or create a WhatsApp group and discuss it instantly? They should've given a definitive interpretation rather than 'let's wait and see'.

Does the IFAB consult the public when laws are changed?

So IFAB, the lawmakers, don't have a clue if the law permits this?

Magic

What do you guys do if it's raining too heavily for you to write anything down in your notebook?

Confirmed

Good job referees are equipped with a coin, then.

The best defense seems to be "I ain't racist, just don't like 'em."

They are both performing the trick so you can technically caution both.

Anyone contacted the IFAB about this?

Crossing

Why does the FA wait for criminal proceedings to conclude before opening thier own proceedings when there are different thresholds for burden of proof? Just like the John Terry case, criminal proceedings and internal FA proceedings have no affect/influence on each other.

Question one: A person is stood in the technical area and is clearly involved with the team (he knows the players, gives instructions, ect) but he is NOT named on the team sheet; he can't be cautioned, right? Question two: Were a team official commits a cautionable offense but the perpetrator...

I suspect the person in charge of the Dutch FA Twitter account has misunderstood the question. This doesn't appear to be an official statement.

The law is clear and supercedes the Dutch FA. Allowing this goal kick trick would require a change in law from the IFAB.

Hell

Whistle (I'm guessing this is the word association game)

Drop ball now days ☹️