Search results

Live I'm going yellow. When broken down like that I'm happy that would be a clear and obvious error

Standing erect between two boxes

Rusty Rod is on there warning people not to bring the laws of the game into fan discussions.

The stadium announcement apparently referenced accidental handball The three types of hand ball; accidental (only an offence when a goal is scored immediately) , non-deliberate (ie unnaturally bigger) and deliberate handball.

There's plenty of level 5s who make it very clear they don't want to go bench side, and may cause issues if you make them. Whereas newer refs are often very keen to go bench side. Most times on MOAS AR1 will just be the first appointed.

365-21 = 344. 3 weeks discounted as time served?

The Scottish show does this and it works great. There's probably some Scottish fans asking for a longer explanation though!

Playing in a dangerous play is predicated on the player being offended against being able to mitigate the risk. The law requires SFP to be a tackle or challenge which is a DFK offence.

Dictionary definition Endangering - put (someone or something) at risk or in danger. Laws of the Game definition Endangering the safety of an opponent Put an opponent at danger or risk (of injury) The glancing blow argument is focusing on a lack of excessive force the player has still...

@Big Cat Very appropriate that it was on Channel 4.

AFCON is AFCON. Palms will be greased and things will move on. The manager will probably be offered a harem and have a statue built. If Senegal do sacrifice him to placate things, he will back at the next AFCON with a different country.

More detail https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/czdq0m2z0emo

Most of the video questions are very clear, of the type - Goalkeeper holding it for 12 seconds, Goalkeeper attempting to kick a bass pack in to play and then handling it, nailed on DOGSO situations, SFP straight leg lunges with considerable force and intensity

You couldn't make it up

Are officials not doing the basics at that level? Ask his name, don't assume or ...

VAR is getting worse generally. Surely they know the SAOT has failed quickly? So these decisions would have took a long time even if they started immediately with the old tech Regardless there have been 5 minute plus offside decisions pre-SAOT.

You had issues like this without the SAOT. Where the best camera angle they had for the offside line had parts of players blocked, they'd then need to parse in information from.other camera angles. Just bin off VAR it's getting worse.

I'm glad this has been highlighted as will help grassroots. It's been an issue every time I've done a girls or women's game. Not one or two usually the majority of players will have earrings. Obviously not being enforced on a weekly basis. .

Fair. Didn't read past section 1 which says the VAR may act on direct red card offences, it then limits them to the below in section 2. From this if the VAR picked up OFFINABUS language they aren't allowed to act on it? Only specified OFFINABUS actions as reviewable. c. Direct red cards (not...