Search results

In my opinion one player hit a ball, another hit head of that player. Look for his head, and look for a ball - he was metres from it...

Ref says there is no faul in that situation, cause that was "unfortunately accident". In my opinion is clear red. What is yours?

I saw that game on tv with my friends, ref decision was clear: foul and yellow card. Which was second for that player, so he must leave a field. For me right decision, but commentators in TV says, that was no foul and referee ruined a game for a white team with this decision. I am supporter of...

I forget to mention: ref originally didn't blow a whistle at all. But after being called by VAR, he check situation on screen, and decided to give a red card to player playing in red. And that was 3' minute of match, and first touch and foul (and last) by player "awarded" red card...

I want to ask question about this situation, cause in my point on view, i would call a foul for a blue team. He doesn't have a ball, and try to take it without thinking of safety for him or other player.

That's normal speed, but poor quality:

Yesterday in polish league we have some situation: Could you tell me your opinion about it? Referee in this game gave a red card for player in red shirt.