Search results

I’m not in this case as to me it’s debatable if I’m even seeing a caution credit VAR for trying to help him as I can see at full speed how he can get it wrong luckily wasn’t long left as it’s a game altering decision

Not sure from that reaction at that age group doesn't imply deliberate to me but these things happen in a split second

Disagree massively here and sounds very defensive in tone.

Then the allegations won’t go away just look at the current issues in Boxing they have had to allow trainers to answer honestly about officiating and scorecards to avoid PR nightmare same here.

For PR they will probably ask him for comment if not it may be pardon the pun a massive own goal plus it’s a good look.

Quite agree however if they sanction him without a detailed investigation it will only heighten suspicion so I would expect no resolution for at least a couple of months for a allegation like this.

15 is interesting as Durham always see 15/16 as equal.

They can’t if a FBO was previously issued for the offence basically you can’t be punished twice.

I have provided sourced material above and another poster has mentioned the West Ham case also

Not sure it’s enforceable when tested what you just showed is clubs act illegally which interesting.

Yes and FSA got the West Ham one quashed in court in under a hour.

Yes Stevenage had to alter there’s for doing exactly that as I knew the lawyer who flagged it.

And any judge is going to quash it per 2014 ruling and probably order clubs to pay legal costs a judge isn’t going to risk his job to help a football club police fans.

No I’m saying if I took you to court and you were convicted of breaking and entering couldn’t then sue you separately for it which is the law.

Yes but this basically says if fan has enough money to challenge court will overturn ban due to this ruling and even private buissness can’t trial people twice.

Bottom paragraph if they get a FBO the club can’t extend it.

max is 10 years Football banning orders were introduced by the Football Spectators Act 1989 (FSA 1989). They are civil orders which aim to stop known hooligans causing trouble at and around football matches, both home and abroad. They are usually imposed by the court after someone has been...

The kids thing is a decision for his partner as social service involvement causes issues for her and her children sins of the father and all that. Also a court in the UK ruled recently a ban with no end date is unenforceable by law.

Yes as this may hold in court

Disagree firstly the social service thing as that could impact a potential partner and kids which is wrong as they are more innocent than anyone as they may not even of been present. Secondly any attempt at lifetime ban would be thrown out in court as per recent case there must now be a...