Search results

I respectfully disagree on the first part but its potatoe potato stuff

I’m with es on this one. I think it merits violent conduct. Hes clearly not challenging or attempting to challenge for the ball. Challenge under the ifab glossary however as you say its still the same outcome. Thought it was clearly excessive

Clarifies that the name shown in stadium was wrong

Hes literally pulling the defender away from being able to challenge for the ball

Ajer 20 looks to be in an offside position and looks to be pulling the defender away. It could be that

Downgraded DOGSO can only be used for a penalty award

Ah apologies. I thought MO was 4th. I should learn to not listen to twitter (x)

Actually the var operator noticed. Oli would be Michael Oliver

Complete mess up off England. Wonder if any further repercussions

Reading only as the words are written, if hes down the touchline to complain then I think that warrants the red. As Santa has said though, YHTBT.

should this not have been a red? deliberately leaving the technical area to: • show dissent towards, or remonstrate with, a match official

In settings. Turn off second last optio

sky are showing it tonight at 8pm

Just to see if there was any debate with it being removed prior to the goal being scored

https://x.com/mundialmag/status/1698350136605221257?s=46&t=QzHk_fLUmQraFX6Gyt4TWA Debate away

I believe so

It’s only allowed here from lowland/highland league and above. (SWPL1 also)

What a save from the keeper but

Not for me. Ezes looking for it. I’d have supported a caution for simulation

We not be comfortable having a IDFK here but it seems to me the laws are pretty clear on this one. The player interferes, stop play, send him off then idfk restart. Same as other laws we might not like but still follow