I don’t know if this reads in a different tone to how you’d intended, but I think this is a bit insulting towards Russell, who has obviously had a superb season to be in a position to be offered promotion.
Personally I wouldn’t give the shiniest **** when the email came, if I were offered Level...
That's correct, an email was recently circulated making it very clear that referees up to and including Level 2B, must follow the correct cautioning procedure.
EDIT - just realised Brian has said the exact same thing in a different thread! Point still stands however!
As rustyref said, at supply/contrib/panel no way should an AR over-rule a referee cutting grass, but at PL level, the assistant knows he has replays to back him up, so if he knows it's the correct decision, he can flag it with confidence!
To be honest, he's the kind of referee some tough Sunday morning games need really. He does need to be very sure he does exactly what he says he's going to do though!
I probably wouldn't recommend marching out on a contrib/supply game and pulling something like this.......
I wouldn’t agree that 8.5 or above at supply/contrib correlates to an ‘above standard’ at county level, because they hardly ever get awarded - in fact, I’d argue that a 7.5/8 correlates more closely to an ‘above standard’, and it’s more than possible to get that in a normal game, providing you...
Out of interest Padfoot, where have you got that handbook from? I observe at county level and haven't received anything like the above quote. Not saying you're wrong, just I haven't been given that. Very similar wording was in the old supply league observer handbook, but that related to marking...
This is a question (as the title suggests) at those of you observing at supply league level, in response to a frustrated colleague of mine who I was chatting to this week.
Do observers mark first-year level 4s lower than those who are more experienced at that level, for a similar performance...
That's the whole point, it's not in the LOTG. But based on every word you've ever posted on here, I think I'd be wasting my time trying to explain 'common sense' and 'empathy for the game' to you.
Your comments regarding the CORE programme are extremely misguided and do a disservice to the...
It doesn't, and you know it doesn't. Don't be a prat.
But that's not what I'm saying. I'm saying that is the message that is being delivered from the FA at the moment - Dan Meeson and his colleagues eulogize about 'what does football expect' at CORE meetings and the like, and quite rightly so...
Exactly this. The big buzz at the moment (particularly from the FA) is 'what does football expect?'
'Football' expects that a player who is bleeding should be allowed to leave the pitch to get himself sorted out without seeking the express permission of the referee, without getting a caution...
So if you get level 3, and then get successive promotions on the line (i.e. going into your 3rd year as a Level 3 and Football League line) - you cannot do both for that third season?
I consider myself quite a lenient referee, particularly towards dissent, but this is a red card for me.
This isn't a stupid comment to anyone listening about "playing against 12" or something like that - this is a direct comment to your face calling your impartiality into question. As Padfoot...
It was for the guy I watched. Turned 16 in September 2016 he told me, did 20+ youth games, and then applied for promotion starting 1st March 2017, and was accepted onto the promotion scheme.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.