I also got a 73 score 7-to-6So I got my first assessment back for level 5. Got a score of 73. Was wondering what would be a decent score for promotion
We were told thatStill don't understand how or why you are getting marks out of 100 for 7-6 and 6-5 observations. its a national scheme and the only permissible grades are well below standard through to well above standard. There's nothing in there to support a numerical mark until you go from 5 to 4.
Seems like your CFA are making it up and deviating from FA policy. The FA only recently resent out the guidelines and form and there is no mention of a numerical mark and all five competencies are still on the form.We were told that
well belowand well aboveare no more
They've simplified it to below, expected and above
Why have five categories when three can achieve the same thing without unduly demotivating anyone?
The numerical mark is presumably an equivalent methodology to that used 5-to-4, only on fewer competencies. I'm inclined to think that the range of achievable scores is quite narrow. Who knows why the score is given. I agree that it's unnecessary from the candidate's perspective
It would be most unlike football to be inconsistentSeems like your CFA are making it up and deviating from FA policy. The FA only recently resent out the guidelines and form and there is no mention of a numerical mark and all five competencies are still on the form.
Weird one that.On another note, I don't get the 'degree of difficulty' rating. What's the point of having 'Challenging' or 'Very Challenging' if those categories are rarely used. I had a threatening player hauled out of the back row of the spectator stand, contributing towards 4 yellows and a red in a Saturday Intermediate CountyC game; yet it was rated 'Normal' for 7-to-6
I thought it was all quite challenging!