A&H

Leeds v Norwich

The Referee Store
Yellow seems right for me. Lucky to get away with his antics after the final whistle though
 
Speed of challenge, no real attempt at ball, no regard for opponents safety, for me, its just a wipe out, happy to take whatever he can, man, ball, both, neither
 
Sheffields Finest said:
Retrospective charge for a head butt maybe??
Click to expand...
Not sure. In game most refs would be split between yellow and red for that ‘headbutt’. Was it a Brentford player who did similar to a Leeds player and nothing was done? Hard to justify Kruls if the other went unpunished
 
Can see both sides for the outside the box challenge.

This nose to nose to stuff is generally a bit of nothing but certainly a head butt (granted a small one) on Bamford which should have been straight red but if the referee has seen it.
 
spuddy1878 said:
Can see both sides for the outside the box challenge.

This nose to nose to stuff is generally a bit of nothing but certainly a head butt (granted a small one) on Bamford which should have been straight red but if the referee has seen it.
Click to expand...
Camera saw it! Lets see!!
 
No action by the FA against Krul. Sort of surprised because it was after the final whistle and just completely unnecessary but there wasn’t too muh in it. Wonder what would’ve happened if Bamford threw himself to the ground like we see in a lot of these incidents
 
alexv said:
No action by the FA against Krul. Sort of surprised because it was after the final whistle and just completely unnecessary but there wasn’t too muh in it. Wonder what would’ve happened if Bamford threw himself to the ground like we see in a lot of these incidents
Click to expand...
Surprised he didn’t if I’m honest! One of his worst traits at Boro was his play acting. The moment any centre back went near him he’d go to ground holding a random body part.

Anyway, not surprised the FA didn’t review it. I’m not sure a referee would even send him off in game but IMO there should have been action as I hate this sort of thing. What does it prove as an action?
 
QuaverRef said:
Surprised he didn’t if I’m honest! One of his worst traits at Boro was his play acting. The moment any centre back went near him he’d go to ground holding a random body part.

Anyway, not surprised the FA didn’t review it. I’m not sure a referee would even send him off in game but IMO there should have been action as I hate this sort of thing. What does it prove as an action?
Click to expand...
Apparently Krul did the same thing to Roofe as well but that was off camera. Seems like a lucky boy to be honest. The one I was really surprised at was the Brentford one against us. Could argue that both players should’ve been punished but this had more intent than Krul’s imo
https://twitter.com/x/status/1048561495146213376
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top