That post is mint.And don't forget that the coin isn't pefectly symmetrical and weighted, either. The fact it has different designs on each side makes that inevitable regardless of any other factor. The differences are small though.
Sterling effort!That post is mint.
It’s a toss you can bank onSterling effort!
It's not entirely randomised. The introduction of any other act than the flip and the land can see an element of bias being introduced. Then again if truth be told, so can the different techniques used to flip the coin, the duration of the drop, the surface they land on, the wind direction and strength.
I teach probability to GCSE level.
True storyThat post is mint.
As someone who does the catch and flip, I imagine it could also come across - to captains that don’t know your flipping habits - that you are deliberately flipping it to heads after seeing it is tails (for example) as an act of bias. Or at least these are the ludicrous thoughts that have entered my mind anyway.The reason why some people say don't catch it in one palm and flip it to the back of the other hand is that it might be possible for the player to see the face while it's in your palm.
This is wrong. Unless you're deliberately trying to manipulate it, it's true that there are a lot of factors that determine the outcome, none of them affect the probability of the outcome. The physical characteristics of the coin might, but catching vs letting it fall do not.
The reason why some people say don't catch it in one palm and flip it to the back of the other hand is that it might be possible for the player to see the face while it's in your palm.
Agree with @Trip on thisIt's not entirely randomised. The introduction of any other act than the flip and the land can see an element of bias being introduced. Then again if truth be told, so can the different techniques used to flip the coin, the duration of the drop, the surface they land on, the wind direction and strength.
I teach probability to GCSE level.
Definitely not normal.What are the chances of two people on this forum teaching probability?
(Rock, paper, scissors, however, is not random. )
Trying to read cues of your opponent and guessing what they are more likely to play.I would be interested to hear the explanation for this. I can see there might be cheating by waiting to see what your opponent does before revealing your choice, but other than that, how does rock, paper scissors not give you a 50% chance of winning?
Possibility of a draw...I would be interested to hear the explanation for this. I can see there might be cheating by waiting to see what your opponent does before revealing your choice, but other than that, how does rock, paper scissors not give you a 50% chance of winning?