A&H

Sin Bins - 17/18 Season

Sheffields Finest said:
'You shouldn't' and 'potentially' are two words that I'm struggling to find in the Laws GraemeS, can you point them out please? Ta
Click to expand...
I didn't realise that every post on here had to be 100% made up of words from the LOTG! I'd be interested to know where the words "struggling" and "Ta!" are if that's an important criteria?

You're responsible for player safety. If a player isn't in control of his body due to alcohol or other substances, you have a responsibility to protect yourself and the other 21 players on the pitch by taking preventative action. In the situation Padfoot is concerned about (a player downing pints in the sin bin), I would be going over there and telling him that at the end of his 10 minutes, he can be replaced by a sub but he's not welcome back on the pitch.

I would also point out that one of the leagues I referee on has specific competition rules about alcohol being pitchside. To quote the email they sent out a few months ago:
"Can I also remind ALL match officials that the drinking of Alcohol around the perimeter of the pitch IS NOT ALLOWED, it is the responsibility of all of you to bring the matter to the attention of the home club and ask the individuals concerned to move away. If they refuse then the match will be abandoned and the club/persons failing to take action or failing to take responsibility must be reported."
Click to expand...
If the "individual involved" is a player who's either in the sin bin or an unusued sub, I would be telling them to move away for the rest of the match.
 
The Referee Store
GraemeS said:
I didn't realise that every post on here had to be 100% made up of words from the LOTG! I'd be interested to know where the words "struggling" and "Ta!" are if that's an important criteria?

You're responsible for player safety. If a player isn't in control of his body due to alcohol or other substances, you have a responsibility to protect yourself and the other 21 players on the pitch by taking preventative action. In the situation Padfoot is concerned about (a player downing pints in the sin bin), I would be going over there and telling him that at the end of his 10 minutes, he can be replaced by a sub but he's not welcome back on the pitch.

I would also point out that one of the leagues I referee on has specific competition rules about alcohol being pitchside. To quote the email they sent out a few months ago:
If the "individual involved" is a player who's either in the sin bin or an unusued sub, I would be telling them to move away for the rest of the match.
Click to expand...
Thats fine Graeme, but that passage is regards supporters, my point was subs! I'm not a policeman or drug tester, i'm sure many players turn up inebriated from last nights excess, some do it weekly! Where do we go with this? Advise the manager, of course, but stop someone playing ???
 
I do like Hockey's answer, two greens= yellow & sin bin, another yellow and it's red. The players know where they stand. They get an opportunity to correct behaviour before it's starts costing them.
 
Sheffields Finest said:
Thats fine Graeme, but that passage is regards supporters, my point was subs! I'm not a policeman or drug tester, i'm sure many players turn up inebriated from last nights excess, some do it weekly! Where do we go with this? Advise the manager, of course, but stop someone playing ???
Click to expand...
So supporters can't drink next to the pitch but players can? I'd rather come across as a little officious than let a player be concussed or have a leg broke by a player who's not in control. Call it over cautious if you want, but I'm still not willing to take that risk.
 
Don't know why there is concern around sin bins - a good idea and simple to administer. Just ask managers to politely request that a player be allowed to re-enter the FOP when the 10 minutes is up. You check the time you noted, and if 10 minutes or more has passed you allow the player back on. Like a substitution but with a time check, and puts the onus on the manager to keep track of the time and therefore not your problem if the manager doesn't request re-entry on time.

Personally, I'd also like to have the ability to move a free kick 9.1 metres rather than booking someone for delaying/not observing the distance. Mind you, a "if I have to ask you to move back I'll also be booking you" often nips that one in the bud.
 
GraemeS said:
So supporters can't drink next to the pitch but players can? I'd rather come across as a little officious than let a player be concussed or have a leg broke by a player who's not in control. Call it over cautious if you want, but I'm still not willing to take that risk.
Click to expand...
I'm with you on player safety Greame but i'm just updating my Law knowledge and i missed the bit you said about stopping players playing??? What page is that on??
 
What is the Sin Bin going to achieve that the current systems in place do not?

Absolutely nothing.

Complete waste of everyone's time, makes more grief for the lone referee on a Sunday morning, pointless fad of an idea designed to pander to the ****wits in the media.
 
the moving the ball forward 10 yards for dissent/delaying etc has been tried and was quickly abandoned.
 
How do you handle this situation?
In the 40th minute of the game (or 5 minutes before half time), you sin bin a player for 10 minutes. You write down on a slip of paper or instruct the coach/manager verbally that the player is allowed back on the FOP at 50 minutes.
Earlier in the game there has been a significant injury stoppage and you play 6 minutes of added time for the 1st half.
With 1 minute of stoppage time left, the manager is asking to get his player back on the FOP. You say no because the slip says 50 minutes. With 30 seconds of stoppage time remaining, the team with the extra player score a goal.
You're going to have a difficult half time break and equally difficult second half. What do you do?
For now, I'm with @Padfoot and don't have a desire to be the guinea pig in this experimental trial. If it works, I'll eat a slice of humble pie but I have many doubts.
 
Yampy said:
How do you handle this situation?
In the 40th minute of the game (or 5 minutes before half time), you sin bin a player for 10 minutes. You write down on a slip of paper or instruct the coach/manager verbally that the player is allowed back on the FOP at 50 minutes.
Earlier in the game there has been a significant injury stoppage and you play 6 minutes of added time for the 1st half.
With 1 minute of stoppage time left, the manager is asking to get his player back on the FOP. You say no because the slip says 50 minutes. With 30 seconds of stoppage time remaining, the team with the extra player score a goal.
You're going to have a difficult half time break and equally difficult second half. What do you do?
For now, I'm with @Padfoot and don't have a desire to be the guinea pig in this experimental trial. If it works, I'll eat a slice of humble pie but I have many doubts.
Click to expand...

Why are we trying to solve the problems? The FA will be doing briefings and training on these issues - Do you think that you are the only ones thinking up these problems!

The full operation of the system will be explained in a full training session to the nominated Leagues, Clubs and Referees. The training will be in the form of online WebEx sessions and potentially attendance at League meetings.
Click to expand...

Anyway, your leagues may not be chosen for the pilot. If @Yampy & @Padfoot don't want their leagues to be involved, send your comments to the league committees - if some referees think it is good idea, encourage your league committees to enter the pilot.
 
lincs22 said:
Do you think that you are the only ones thinking up these problems!
Click to expand...
I'm sure I'm not and if I am, we're in trouble.
Football doesn't control time accurately enough for a time based sanction to work efficiently. That's my opinion and as I said, I'll eat humble pie if it works.
 
I think I'm pretty good at managing dissent and the county FA have made loads of money out of it so see no real reason to change.
If the gobby players think they're getting a "free" go they'll use it. They get to have a pop at the referee and it won't cost them a tenner, plus they get a 10 minute rest. I'm not there to be the whipping boy so if they want to take that free go then they had better stop well before I consider it OFFINABUS because I might have to lower my tolerance levels for that and simply bin them!
 
OIREF! said:
Anyone know if this is still covered by the laws/rules of rugby - it seems like quite a while since I saw it implemented.
Click to expand...
I believe that's covered in 21.3 (law 21 is penalty and free kicks) where it states:

Rugby Laws said:
Any further infringement by the opposing team results in a second penalty kick, ten metres ahead of the mark for the first kick.
Click to expand...

That (as a non-Rugby referee) suggests to me that dissent, failing to give appropriate distance, etc could all result in a boost like that.
 
100% with @Padfoot on this it is going to be such a headache for the lone referee. A league i officiate on has been asked to pilot this.

Imagine this.... A player is cautioned for dissent and is sin binned, 3.5 minutes later you have to bin another and 2 minutes after that you need to bin another. You now have 3 players off the pitch one is due back in 10 minutes, another in 8 minutes and another in 4.5 minutes.

How do you manage and keep track of that whilst giving the pitch 100% concentration.

If anything i think this could lead to referee's actually avoiding issuing the caution to avoid the hassle and therefore increase dissent in a roundabout way.
 
Not to mention the fact that once they realise they are heading off for 10 mins, or their team mates realise they are down to 10, this will inevitably invite more dissent towards the referee.......
 
Agree with concerns above and surely teams that have the game won/lost then know they have a free pass as far as dissent goes, this increasing once you reach 10 minutes left.

As PP62 says above, this might well lead to referees finding more comments "offensive" and reaching for the red cards.
 
I'm not sure why people are saying this will attract further dissent? From what I read in the mail contained in the OP, the caution is still a caution - the player is just "paying" for the caution with 10 minutes off the pitch rather than filling the CFA's coffers with £10. So if that player comes back on and is still being gobby etc, a second caution would be accompanied with a red and off he goes. How many matches do we think it would take players to learn that if they give a mouthful to the referee they'll be sat on the sidelines; and whilst they - and any other team mates that join them - are sat there they are giving the opposition an opportunity to score.

And as for "managing it", as I've said before, get the managers to do the "multiple" time-keeping.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top