I agree it's worth appealing, but 32 fouls is indicative of 6.5 unless the game was unusual in some way. For example, a pressing need to give lots of foul tackles to prevent further misconduct in a heated game
@Rob123 whilst 6.0 is wrong, you should take heed of the foul count. As you progress, the players are more able to tolerate contact without losing balance. I think it also demonstrates confidence in your own ability to wait for those moments when you're certain the contact was careless or reckless, particularly with upper body stuff. This actually helps with consistency because you don't get lost giving some marginal decisions but not others and it can make for a better game in which the participants are appreciative of your anonymity. It's a real sickener when you get a mark that falls short of your expectations, but two weeks from now, once the disappointment has morphed into something more constructive, you'll be a better referee for the experience