There was an interesting bit of VAR protocol here regarding the Chinese penalty kick which was awarded without an on field review. I'm guessing that the VAR told the referee that the Chinese player was onside and this changed the referee's on field decision to penalty kick and the VAR did not see this as clearly and obviously wrong. However, I think the referee should have gone to the monitor to sort all of this out because it looked like the Chinese player dived - this also would have helped 'sell' the decision. Alternatively, the VAR could have recognised that 'no penalty' was not clearly and obviously wrong and not intervened?