Have a watch of the feet. If there was no trip, that's a certain goalThought the only contact was an.arm on the shoulder which I didn't think was a foul.
Yeah you can tell he was tripped by just looking at how his leg moved and then go caught up.There a bump in the back of Wellbeck and a little trip on his right foot. This is the moment .
View attachment 4870
VAR did not have good enough technology to be convinced of contact. The it's easier proven on physics of motion. Wellbecks right foot have a slight pause after this frame in movement causing a mistiming.
It's not clear and obvious because you need a high speed camera to clearly show the trip not because the trip want there. Another failing of the implementation of VAR.
Yeah you can tell he was tripped by just looking at how his leg moved and then go caught up.
Maguire's instant guilty face gives it all away too.
I'd Still say it's C&O because it is seen and VAR could have frozen it to that frame on the other side. Why didn't VAR go to a different, maybe better, angle?
I remember the Pogba penalty a few weeks ago when VAR spent what seemed 3/4 mins trying to find an angle to prove the miminal contact (brushing of knees if that) to overturn the referees decision and award another utd penalty. Why wasn't it done here?