You've gone soft lad! Lockdown is getting to some folk. Imagining stuff and all sorts, so I've heardThat's not what happened though.
You've gone soft lad! Lockdown is getting to some folk. Imagining stuff and all sorts, so I've heardThat's not what happened though.
They are both challenging for space though aren't they? And that is a common and accepted part of football. As I said before, I don't disagree it is his responsibility to ensure this sort of contact doesn't happen when challenging for space (or for the ball) but to say that he did it deliberately is stretching it.
Course it is. He has gone to lift his arm over the attempted grapple of Mitrovic. And has clocked him in the face by accident.
You've gone soft lad! Lockdown is getting to some folk. Imagining stuff and all sorts, so I've heard
We have it on camera. I'm unsure where this "deliberate" or "intentional" stuff comes from to be honest.
If he hadn't meant it then it wouldn't have happened.
Except that there is a clause for VC in law that required you to judge if contact to head was "deliberate". Telepathic or not, as a referee you have to judge that.None of us are telepathic. You look at what occurred and sanction accordingly.
aaaaaaaaand overturned
Came here to post this.
I might voice strong opinions to everyone's dread, but Hackett is being ridiculous if he said thatI’ve also just read part of an article that states Keith Halkett belives Dean and Mason should step down as referees. I am speechless
I have done something similar as a referee.Me too. Have you ever stood on the edge of a penalty area waiting for a free kick to happen and "accidentally" jabbed your elbow into somebody's face?
Me neither...
But its not objectively correct by the laws either
I'll rephrase - IF the contact was deemed deliberate and with more than negligible force, than by Law the red card for VC was mandatory. I personally don't think it was deliberate, but I can see why the negligible force standard was met (not really saying I agree with it).
So if the final decision was that the contact was deliberate and more than negligible, the Laws mandate the send-off whether we agree with it or not. I personally don't think this fit the criteria for a send-off, and I also don't think it was a clear and obvious error to not rule this as a send-off on the field. Therefore, I personally think this was not a good usage of VAR.
Came here to post this.
I don't care how bad a decision is, nobody deserves this kind of treatment. It's made even worse by the fact that the majority of replies to the news on social media justify him and his family being abused and sent death threats. I really hate football sometimes.
He's also asked not to referee this coming weekend - https://www.skysports.com/football/...league-fixtures-after-receiving-death-threats
I might voice strong opinions to everyone's dread, but Hackett is being ridiculous if he said that
So, MD twice gets told to go to the monitor by VAR. To give reds he doesn’t want to give. Both are overturned on appeal. Now death threats.
VAR just has to go.
So, MD twice gets told to go to the monitor by VAR. To give reds he doesn’t want to give. Both are overturned on appeal. Now death threats.
VAR just has to go.