RefereeX's latest activity
-
RRefereeX replied to the thread Brentford v Wolves.I don't think so. It says 'may' therefore not must and also the backpass wasn't how they gained possession. They already had possession...
-
RRefereeX replied to the thread True Story....Had to google to check if a monitor was a type of lizard after approx 20 seconds of pondering... 4/10.
-
RRefereeX replied to the thread Brentford v Wolves.If it was the other way round and the defender player it off of the attacker to the goalkeeper, even if the touch by the attacker was...
-
RRefereeX replied to the thread Cup Final Fixture.Highly unlike game will have ET, but ensure you're familiar with competition rules to be safe. Penalty shoot outs, definitely ensure...
-
RI don’t think you should ever worry it will look sh#t to the Observer for something that needs to happen, especially if you could have...
-
RRefereeX replied to the thread Brentford v Wolves.Would be shocked if this is actually the case. More likely that it’s out of VARs remit due to not being part of the attacking phase of play
-
RRefereeX replied to the thread Notts County boot!.He does ultimately stop it while the offending team have possession, but it takes him a while so he's probably not actually realised...
-
RNo. The manager can't issue a caution. Only the referee can.
-
RRefereeX replied to the thread Notts County boot!.Funnily enough I mentioned in front of another National list referee that I thought the caution (second caution in this case) was...
-
Rvery happy with a yellow here, couldn't be anymore unsporting if he tried
-
RI had a closely related issue in a game in probably my 3rd or 4th match as a level 4. I did the same team twice in very close...
-
RRefereeX reacted to Archer's post in the thread Changing facilities at premier level for u18s with
Haha.
Shame you didn’t stay on my match. Had to organise that for AR2. Gotta be worth an extra 0.5 right? 😉 😂 -
RThat’s just their defending 🎣 😂
