That has always been my interpretation too. There is absolutely nothing that we do that says play is restarted that is clearer than giving the players the ball. Make sure they are paying attention obviously and that any carnage has been cleared from the pitch, but why on earth do the players...
I had an incident where two U12's were challenging for the ball on the run using quite a lot, but a reasonable amount of mutual shoulder to shoulder contact. The defender managed to get to the ball and clear it out for a throw but that caused him to spin and tumble to the ground and end up...
If he was blocked by the defenders body from seeing where and how the ball and player came into contact then it seems to me reasonable for him to take a look at a reply and for VAR to suggest he did. It's analogous to whether a referee sees an incident during a game and the ability to take...
I worked with a guy who would ask the captains the name of their keepers at the coin toss and then call out to them to ask if they were ready before kick-off using their names. It felt very creepy when they were females. Luckily he has retired now.
I'm in the visual check camp. On the odd...
It's maddening that they have been "dropping hints" about the upcoming law changes since the AGM but refusing to publish details of the proposed changes. If they'd put out the details of what was up for review / approval it would have completely avoided the false reporting of penalty kick...
It's been rumored for a couple of years now that the laws will be updated to fall in line with the outdoor game but it has still not happened.
Anyone know why not, and when we might finally see an update?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.