Fulham vs Huddersfield

[Joshref]

I’m not moaning about a decision going against Huddersfield this week, instead the opposite. Will try to find a clip but for anyone watching the game, that’s not a pen is it?

Fulham keeper has nowhere to go, feel that’s very unlucky. But Huddersfield take the pen and a shock 2-0 lead against Fulham so I’m not complaining

 

[RobOda]

This one?

 

[Anubis]

Very definition of pk, and credit referee for a good advantage in the build up.

would have been a red under the old dogso laws, then we are in the unlucky camp, so this pen is a good example of the positive change

 

[Kent Ref]

In this scenario the keeper held his ground and the attacker ran into the keeper. Does this mean the keeper was at fault? I think this is harsh on the keeper.

 

[RustyRef]

Not for me, the attacker has just run straight into the keeper who can really do nothing about it.

 

[LancsReferee]

Not a penalty. Keeper has done nothing wrong. He's not impeded the attacker in any way.

 

[Kent Ref]

Very definition of pk, and credit referee for a good advantage in the build up.

would have been a red under the old dogso laws, then we are in the unlucky camp, so this pen is a good example of the positive change

Are you still of the opinion it's a penalty?

 

[Max2]

Great advantage, then craps the bed with the pen. Adrenaline, eh? What a drug.

 

[RobOda]

It's clever from the attacker, but I think the keeper should have gone all in - if he dives on that ball it's an easy sell for me to go the other way.

But I'm with @Anubis I'd be giving a penalty here. The minority club!

 

[Anubis]

Are you still of the opinion it's a penalty?

Yes

8 days a week

 

[Tealeaf]

In real time, watching it live yesterday I was happy. Keeper appeared to challenge from behind the attacker and clean him out.

On seeing the replay I’m of the opinion that at worst it’s a subjective call. Don’t give it? Not going to complain and say you’re wrong. Give it? Not going to complain and say you’re wrong.

I can genuinely live with either decision. It’s most definitely not a mistake for me.

 

[Kent Ref]

Yes

8 days a week

What has the keeper done wrong then? I just cannot see it.

 

[Anubis]

What has the keeper done wrong then? I just cannot see it.

Fouled the striker.

 

[Kent Ref]

Fouled the striker.

Sorry to be so pedantic but i was asking what did the keeper do to foul the player.

Your answer does not explain your reasoning.

 

[Quarryref]

Not for me. The keeper has a right to his position and the attacker initiates the contact. The GK could have helped himself by staying square, rather than half turning his back, but that is GK technique not LOTG

Goal Kick.

 

[ARF]

Definitely not a foul for me - attacker's caused the contact.

 

[es1]

i dont think it's nailed on but i can see why it can be given. i dont think VAR would overturn it given the opportunity

 

[Kent Ref]

Fouled the striker.

I thought you would be able to explain to me what i had missed. Maybe not this time, eh?

 

[Anubis]

I thought you would be able to explain to me what i had missed. Maybe not this time, eh?

user Tealeaf has posted all thats needed.

 

[Kent Ref]

user Tealeaf has posted all thats needed.

I am now confused.

Tealeaf is 50/50 on this. They are happy with both decisions.

You were not. You said "it's a penalty 8 days a week".

That's a different view to yours. Maybe you didn't read it properly.