Help keep RefChat running, any donation would be appreciated
Would fall under the relatively generous definition of a challenge for the ball .. so nope.No red card?
For me he only had intention to stop the player having a shot. Challenge for the ball - not for me. Brave reffing required here.Wo
Would fall under the relatively generous definition of a challenge for the ball .. so nope.
Good luck with thatFor me he only had intention to stop the player having a shot. Challenge for the ball - not for me. Brave reffing required here.

I'm pretty sure the expectation from PGMOL there is a caution, it needs to be a very cynical foul with the ball nowhere near for them to rule it wasn't a challenge for the ball.For me he only had intention to stop the player having a shot. Challenge for the ball - not for me. Brave reffing required here.