Help keep RefChat running, any donation would be appreciated
Are you sure that's right, the only reason I ask is take this scenario:Although if a player uses a deliberate trick to circumvent the law then the IDFK is from where the trick was used.
Are you sure that's right, the only reason I ask is take this scenario:
A player has the ball at his feet and then flicks it up to his head and heads it back to the keeper and the keeper picks it up. As steve C said the offence is when the keeper picks the ball up, not the original pass so I can't see why you would take an IDFK from the point where the player heads it because in theory he has done nothing wrong?
Ok, thanks for the clarification, it makes sense I suppose but on the other hand it doesn't. Oh well, you learn something new every day100% sure. Law says (P123):
There are different circumstances when a player must be cautioned for unsporting behaviour, e.g. if a player uses a deliberate trick while the ball is in play to pass the ball to his own goalkeeper with his head, chest, knee, etc. in order to circumvent the Law, irrespective of whether the goalkeeper touches the ball with his hands or not. The offence is committed by the player in attempting to circumvent both the letter and the spirit of Law 12 and play is restarted with an indirect free kick.
The thing that I hadn't remembered was that the goalkeeper doesn't even need to touch the ball for this to be called! Not sure if I would be brave enough to caution for a flick-up and header where the keeper then just boots the ball away...
