Based on tonight, I think France would have won the final anyway
In saying that, France should be able to brush Croatia aside too
Well, I'm not sure England will beat Belgium either.
Based on tonight, I think France would have won the final anyway
In saying that, France should be able to brush Croatia aside too
Imagine being told before the tournament starts that you will face Belguim twice and neither match would mean a thing!
I won’t be watching either as away with the little one down the parents & they detest football.
I’ll be having a tenner on Pogba man of the match in the final as he’s done sweet FA so far & I can see him saving his best game for the final.
That’s me and the World Cup done thanks Fifa for making my job ten times harder next season & good luck to Rochi if he gets the final.
Mbape v Young would have been ridiculous anyway.
Pogba & Kante v Henderson.
France will brush Croatia aside.
Sweet FA? Did you watch the Semi final? Pogba and Kante were the perfect midfield pairing!
Nah didn’t watch it properly from what I saw France looked slightly better, Pogba didn’t exactly pull up any trees did he.
Has he scored or assisted yet? Or won a man of the match award.
Don't get bogged down on stats. He's been a huge influence for France this tournament., especially on the defensive side of his game. When you're in a top quality side like France and have players like Lloris, Mbappe and Greizemann around you, it's easy to have a great performance in midfield but get over shadowed by the players infront and behind you.
That's me agreeing with you saying that Pogba would be a good MOTM bet, decent odds as well I expect
I’m a fan & believe me I’m aware that players that anchor midfields are often overlooked they are as important as your Neymars & Messi’s.
Pogba can look unplayable at times for Utd & France but I’m still unconvinced he’s living upto the price tag & form he showed for Juve.
But yeah he’s won me a fair few quid before on Man of the match so I’ll have a tickle on it.
Problem with this World Cup they seem to give it to goalscorers or keepers.
Very messy with the delayed (and wrong) offside flag, commentators still can't work it out
Looked onside to me, but again, I've only seen it once so am happy to accept I may be wrong on that.Was it wrong Graeme? Only seen 1 quick freeze frame and to me only the defender's arm played him onside, but lotg says all players arms don't count, so you could argue he was offside. They certainly got a fk for it.
Looked onside to me, but again, I've only seen it once so am happy to accept I may be wrong on that.
What looked messy to me was how long the game was allowed to continue before the flag eventually did go up. The striker had two shots, the ball bounced (only just) out of play and was then hoofed upfield, and because of the delay, it took a second watch for me to work out what had happened. And the commentators still hadn't worked it out later, referring to the IFK as a goal kick and then wondering why a corner wasn't given as it clearly touched a defender last. Flags and signals etc are supposed to add clarity, and by waiting until the ball went out to use his flag, the offside decision was made less clear.
As I understand it, the AR was just following the instructions they have been given. These are apparently that when there is a marginal offside with a potential goal in the offing, the AR should delay the flag until the goal opportunity is over. If Kane had scored on either attempt, the preceding play including the potential offside would automatically have been looked at by VAR.What looked messy to me was how long the game was allowed to continue before the flag eventually did go up. The striker had two shots, the ball bounced (only just) out of play and was then hoofed upfield, and because of the delay, it took a second watch for me to work out what had happened