one
RefChat Addict
I'd give "DOG- so" for this. Anyone else?
Last edited:
DOGSO?
- Thread starter one
- Start date
Donate to RefChat
Help keep RefChat running, any donation would be appreciated
I'd give "DOG- so" for this. Anyone else?
Nah red card to penalty taker for animal cruelty haha
Richard smith
Well-Known Member
Surely that is interference by an outside agent ???
In which case, according to my understanding of LoTG the referee awards a goal based on what happens next
In which case, according to my understanding of LoTG the referee awards a goal based on what happens next
Middle Man
Member
I’d say he was like a dog after that!
A goal can only be awarded if the ball goes into the goal. The bit you are referring to is
If a ball is going into the goal and the interference does not prevent a defending
player playing the ball, the goal is awarded if the ball enters the goal (even if
contact was made with the ball) unless the ball enters the opponents’ goal.
Law 14 folks. This is a retake.
Ciley Myrus
RefChat Addict
Good to see Kenny Dogleash still got a good touch on him
Pity that team missed the pen, they would have taken the lead
Pity that team missed the pen, they would have taken the lead
Ciley Myrus
RefChat Addict
On a serious note, James hits the nail on the head
Scary somebody even suggested giving a goal for a ball which does not enter the goal though
Scary somebody even suggested giving a goal for a ball which does not enter the goal though
one
RefChat Addict
For the retake, will you allow the coach to substitute the keeper with the dog after that save? Of course after he adds the name to the team sheet.
Ciley Myrus
RefChat Addict
Ciley Myrus
RefChat Addict
I recognise that stadium, Kenilworth Road , home of Luton FC
Russell Jones
RefChat Addict
The kind of clip that certainly gives you paws for thought .....
Richard smith
Well-Known Member
If this was meat to be humour Ciley, you have failed
Ciley Myrus
RefChat Addict
Sorry? I find it funny but not nearly as funny as your suggestion of awarding a goal when no goal has been scored. Where on earth would that idea even be logical in anyone's planet? Oh here, the ball is not over the line but hey you know what, am gonna give a goal anyway. Then, worse, you have your 2 teams/officials etc thinking you are right !!
then a responsible referee comes along next week and does things properly and its THEY who will cop the flack.
As another user said, the answer to the OP is not even up for interpretation, its clear, in the LOTG
if we all just took the readings of the good book out onto the pitch then things would be so much easier.
I find your tagline thing amusing, "if you don't like it, you know where the dressing room is" maybe you should add on "and btw I warn you know am not coherent with the LOTG"