I agree Peter but the first one stands out as a bit more manageable, what’s else she supposed to do? If it was lip then fair enough!Fairly standard two yellows leading to red, IMHO. Nothing remarkable about it at all, for me.
On the first yellow, she may have got something on the ball but she also slid in from behind with her momentum taking her on into the player and as I'm sure you know, getting the ball does not absolve a player of wrongdoing. Given that it was a foul and it stopped a promising attack, a yellow seemed perfectly appropriate.
Thats correct. YC can still be given for reckless.I was under the potentially gross misapprehension that the yc for spa was not to be given under the new lotg, if advantage had been played. Have I totally misread that?
Thanks. I assumed that a lot would be classed as reckless or other yc offence anyway.Thats correct. YC can still be given for reckless.
That's true, but the yellow card she (presumably) got for SPA was the first caution and advantage was not played on it. On the second yellow, advantage was played but that caution was almost certainly for a reckless challenge, not SPA.I was under the potentially gross misapprehension that the yc for spa was not to be given under the new lotg, if advantage had been played. Have I totally misread that?
I'm not sure what you mean by, "what else was she supposed to do?" If you're talking about Scott then the what she's supposed to do is not foul the opponent when they're in a promising attacking position.I agree Peter but the first one stands out as a bit more manageable, what’s else she supposed to do? If it was lip then fair enough!
If every tackle with contact was a card then the game would be dead. I agree it was a foul but thought the card wasn’t necessarily required on that occasion.I'm not sure what you mean by, "what else was she supposed to do?" If you're talking about Scott then the what she's supposed to do is not foul the opponent when they're in a promising attacking position.
If every tackle with contact was a card then the game would be dead. I agree it was a foul but thought the card wasn’t necessarily required on that occasion.
There was? Striker missed the shotWould've been better to stop the game for the second yellow card. Only play advantage for a red card offence if there is a clear goal scoring opportunity.
The foul was in the other half of the field. At that moment there was nothing more than a promising attack. Stop the game, show the cards, free kick.There was? Striker missed the shot
Referee also hung back as the attack progressed - perhaps to ensure she didn’t lose the player in question?
She doesn't wear a ring, she wears tape in place of a ring. I do exactly the sameEllen White being allowed on the pitch wearing a ring wasn't too impressive.
Welcome to the group - you can help us with a question raised a couple of weeks ago . . . why wear tape on a ring finger when it has no ring on it?She doesn't wear a ring, she wears tape in place of a ring. I do exactly the same