Help keep RefChat running, any donation would be appreciated
Same.My jaw is on the floor. What’s everyone’s thoughts?
Same.
Just give the goal.
Its what football expects.
Because during the advantage City player fouled the Liverpool defender, who may have cleared the ball. .how can that be denial of a goal scoring opportunity when they scored - my brother
I’m still not sure. wish they had just left it
Wouldn’t say it’s ‘bottling’ a red - it’s giving a goal which to be honest suits everybodyJust no. You don't get to ignore a foul jusy so you can bottle a RC.
But hes given it for DOGSO.... but he scored.Just no. You don't get to ignore a foul jusy so you can bottle a RC.
Yes, but he only scored because Haaland fouled Szoboslai, without that foul he would probably have stopped the ball from crossing the line.But hes given it for DOGSO.... but he scored.
Does the attacker committing an offence negate the advantage?I'm not sure that red is correct in law. It feels like a rugby union scenario where you go back for the first offence
But hes given it for DOGSO.... but he scored.