socal lurker
RefChat Addict
If The pulling has any affect, then it impedes the movement of the opponent and is holding. Why would we want a pulling offense that applies when there is no impact on the opponent?If we look at it technically there is no direct free kick offence listed as pull, or pulling, in the LOTG.
Pulling gets two mentions, once for SPA and once for DOGSO, both times as actions that result in a sanction that can't be downgraded for those offences.
So when we see a player 'pulling' this is actually a holding offence, and as we know from the definition of holding, a holding offence only occurs where
contact with an opponent’s body
or equipment impedes the opponent’s movement.
I think the fix for this would be to list pulling as an offence, separate to holding, as football clearly expects pulling of a players equipment to be punished, but often the way the laws are written means that although the opponent is holding (insert pulling) the players equipment there movement is not impeded and thus no offence is being committed.
i don’t think the problem with “pulling” is that it isn’t a separate offense, not that the “misses” don’t involve impeding the movement of the opponent. I think the issue is that referees sometimes want too much impeding of the opponents motion before they call it.