ladbroke8745
RefChat Addict
We are very poor...
But was that really a free kick that led to the 2nd goal???
But was that really a free kick that led to the 2nd goal???
From the 1st angle of that video it looks like he misses the ball but was actually a pretty good tackle and unfortunately it ended up in the back of the net else I’m not sure it would even have been discussedRef must've thought Rice missed the ball, it was a foul on Rice.
Then it should've been an idfk, there was only contact because De Bruyne was careless.European football you almost always get penalised for tackling with your foot that high regardless of what contact is made with the ball.
Contact always means DFK. But contact is not required for it to be a DFK offense; all that is required is that the tackle or challenge be careless.Then it should've been an idfk, there was only contact because De Bruyne was careless.
Their was a second between a possible case of PIADM and De Bruyne carelessly initiating contact by kicking him.Contact always means DFK. But contact is not required for it to be a DFK offense; all that is required is that the tackle or challenge be careless.