Ahh, this video may be from when the referee was considered part of the field? That would make sense.from what i recall this happened quite a few years ago so goal was right at the time. if it happened now then drop ball would be correct
That was my first thought as well. Don't think there's ever a scenario of active play when you need to be inside the 6.Still a great example of where not to position yourself on the field of play though
I assume the referee was endeavouring to get in a position to see if the ball crossed the goal line? If so, might have been better to push wider so still having a good angle to make that decision but with less chance of becoming ‘involved’ in play. On more than one occasion I have been told by observers that it is OK to push that deep to make that call if you are fit enough to be able to recover quickly. Interested to hear what others think?
True - and I wouldn't be surprised if this incident (and others like it, along with the publicity they engendered) weren't among the reasons the law was changed.from what i recall this happened quite a few years ago so goal was right at the time. if it happened now then drop ball would be correct
True - and I wouldn't be surprised if this incident (and others like it, along with the publicity they engendered) weren't among the reasons the law was changed.
100% disagree. Deliberately misapplying the Laws to void a valid goal is not common sense.it's a shame that some common sense wasn't able to be applied at the time to prevent a sense of injustice.
Cheers, enjoyed that.There's an old ITV short film ("Sunday Again and Sweet FA") which follows a sunday league team, a put-upon referee with a philosophical approach, and the various hangers-on we see around the matches - and the end is very similar to what we saw in this clip, which I think was from three years ago?
Nearly fifty years ago, and absolutely nothing has changed except the hairstyles, and the pitches are (slightly) better!Cheers, enjoyed that.