That was my thought aswell, good that I'm not the only one. If the goalkeeper encroaches, a retake would be right. But the ManU players encroaching had no impact on the penalty taker, and the penalty was saved.It didn't look like it but the one who scored definitely did. Others didn't impact the outcome from memory.
Yep if not already on a yellow I reckon thats a RCAlso, is Maguire's SYC not a direct RC for DOGSO?
Also would VAR change a SYC to a RC?Yep if not already on a yellow I reckon thats a RC
I disagree here. If it goes to VAR, you have to be very forensic and come to the right decision. Also, for encroaching, the position of the feet is considered, not the upper body. And as the line is also the penalty area, both teams are always encroaching.Watched on Sky Sports App, I think you would have a weak argument that both attackers & defenders were encroaching, the expectation would or could have been indirect free kick.
I must admit I lose the will to live trying to make sense of how the procedure rules for law 14 are laid out. Apart from the "summary table", where does it say what to do in these circumstances?It didn't look like it but the one who scored definitely did. Others didn't impact the outcome from memory.
The pen in the 8th should not have been a retake. It should have been an IFK. Had the retake been scored, the game prob would have been replayed.
In principle, a match is not invalidated because of:
malfunction(s) of the VAR technology (as for goal line technology (GLT))
wrong decision(s) involving the VAR (as the VAR is a match official)
decision(s) not to review an incident
review(s) of a non-reviewable situation/decision
Someone help me out here.I must admit I lose the will to live trying to make sense of how the procedure rules for law 14 are laid out. Apart from the "summary table", where does it say what to do in these circumstances?
I am not sure about your questions. You have asked for help to answer a lot of what seem to be rhetorical questions. I think it will be a lot easier if you told us the points you are trying to make?Someone help me out here.
I see no narrative about this - just in the summary table, where encroachment by defending and attacking players is a retake.
"Impacting"? Only relevant to offences by the GK.
"For encroaching, the position of the feet is considered, not the upper body". Says who?
Is this another case of "secret knowledge"?
I am not sure about your questions. You have asked for help to answer a lot of what seem to be rhetorical questions. I think it will be a lot easier if you told us the points you are trying to make?
Ok I will give it 'my' answers since @es1 thinks you are asking fair and valid question. But at the very least I think there is plenty of sarcasm in it.Someone help me out here.
I see no narrative about this - just in the summary table, where encroachment by defending and attacking players is a retake.
"Impacting"? Only relevant to offences by the GK.
"For encroaching, the position of the feet is considered, not the upper body". Says who?
Is this another case of "secret knowledge"?
For op, I firmly believe if Femenia (I think) who scored the goal was standing in a position similar to any of Man U players (as per my image above), the goal would have stood. Implying non of Man U players are encroaching.