This seems clear as day...everyone is expecting a penalty here
Massive difference here is Onana got absolutely nowhere near the ball.I wonder if the fact that the ball was already played and going away from goal before impact influenced the decision and it then falls into a similar category as the Brentford v Spurs incident
New record time for an admitted error?From a BBC journalist:
Probably because the PGMOL official sat in the stand didn't even need to wait to watch videos, he saw it real time.New record time for an admitted error?
I think that absolutely influenced the decision . . . that plus latitude for the keeper who has his eyes on the ball when he goes up . . .I wonder if the fact that the ball was already played and going away from goal before impact influenced the decision
I don’t disagree with your concept, but am quibbling with your language. The same standard applies to whether it should be recommended for review by the VAR and whether it should have been reversed on review by the R.I cannot believe that wasn’t even recommended for a review, to me that’s a clear and obvious error to not award a penalty there. Missed the ball, slammed his body into the player than thrown his arms down on top of him
I don’t think you’ll get a lot of buyers on that one. The GK was making a play on the ball with his hands--he missed, but it’s not the same thing as an outfield player hands to face.Contact to the head with force - argument for serious foul play there
Not sure I 100% follow, not from a point of disagreement, just confusionThe same standard applies to whether it should be recommended for review by the VAR and whether it should have been reversed on review by the R