When I'm running the line I try to match my tolerance to the Referee's as much as possible, including for dissent/offinabus.
Had a moment in a game yesterday, referee has a high tolerance for dissent and physicality compared to me (they are a 4, I'm a 7), so I have been matching that no problems.
At one point a player is right in front of me, believes they are fouled but I don't flag because they weren't from my view. He responds with "You're a ****house" and then "**** you" twice.
I've told the ref it's dissent for me and the ref has a strong word using stepped approach, this is based on the bar set for dissent so far in the game.
If I was in the middle he'd be gone for offinabus but didn't want to make life harder for the ref in the middle by having a different bar, was this right?
Had a moment in a game yesterday, referee has a high tolerance for dissent and physicality compared to me (they are a 4, I'm a 7), so I have been matching that no problems.
At one point a player is right in front of me, believes they are fouled but I don't flag because they weren't from my view. He responds with "You're a ****house" and then "**** you" twice.
I've told the ref it's dissent for me and the ref has a strong word using stepped approach, this is based on the bar set for dissent so far in the game.
If I was in the middle he'd be gone for offinabus but didn't want to make life harder for the ref in the middle by having a different bar, was this right?