Table looks wrong instantly just thinking back to the VAR decisions in Liverpool United game?
I'm getting a message that the page doesn't exist. Maybe he deleted it. Can you summarise what it said?
Fortunately, someone else screenshotted it:I'm getting a message that the page doesn't exist. Maybe he deleted it. Can you summarise what it said?
Table looks wrong instantly just thinking back to the VAR decisions in Liverpool United game?
Fortunately, someone else screenshotted it:
So in line with this, was it the correct decision to just play on then? If TAA was to be penalised for handball, I assume the penalty would have been ruled out because of Bernados handball so what are we saying, TAA had a free hit? I don't fully understand how TAA would have been penalised in this circumstance
Oh I agree completely on that point, it's also definitely not helped by the PL's recent insistence on immediately defending every decision on twitter - taking a complete guess at the reasoning, seemingly without getting the referee in question to comment!If, ITOTR TAA is HB then it should be DFK red.
If, ITOTR TAA is not HB then play on.
To say TAA was HB and play on would be an error in law wouldn’t it?
Riley and the pundits not helping here. I just watched an hour of the MLS VAR review show, apart from the couple of times the chief skirted a missing card it was great to see the decisions and hear them
I think the MLS and EPL are on a different planet from one another however. Just because an aspect of VAR might work over there, doesn't mean it will tick a box this side of the pondIf, ITOTR TAA is HB then it should be DFK red.
If, ITOTR TAA is not HB then play on.
To say TAA was HB and play on would be an error in law wouldn’t it?
Riley and the pundits not helping here. I just watched an hour of the MLS VAR review show, apart from the couple of times the chief skirted a missing card it was great to see the decisions and hear them
The point is that a senior official official explaining decisions on TV is great for making us appear human and rational and helps our credibility and control across the board (even if it is connected to VAR)I think the MLS and EPL are on a different planet from one another however. Just because an aspect of VAR might work over there, doesn't mean it will tick a box this side of the pond
That suits the US market, but over here, putting decisions (VAR) into words would likely inflame the hype furtherThe point is that a senior official official explaining decisions on TV is great for making us appear human and rational and helps our credibility and control across the board (even if it is connected to VAR)
Seriously? Some random guy on twitter (with Utd in his username too! ) twists and distorts a screenshot and you're using it as evidence of....what exactly?
Just think what you can do if you REALLY want to prove a player was offside if you've more than 10 seconds to look at it!!!
Seriously? Some random guy on twitter (with Utd in his username too! ) twists and distorts a screenshot and you're using it as evidence of....what exactly?
The point I am making is, the current wording of the law means if you think the TAA was handball, no matter what you do, it could well be an error in law or at least a conflicting situation.To say TAA was HB and play on would be an error in law wouldn’t it?
That suits the US market, but over here, putting decisions (VAR) into words would likely inflame the hype further
It wasn’t offside, let’s move on
Just think what you can do if you REALLY want to prove a player was offside if you've more than 10 seconds to look at it!!!