Help keep RefChat running, any donation would be appreciated
It really all depends on what they are being asked for an opinion on....
Have a poll ruffleref.
As it looks like you are determined to have this discussion, let me just remind you - this descends into bitter argument it will be locked. Behave like grown ups though...
No intention of an aguement, just interested to hear thoughts...





Depends.
Going with the information given it's like asking "is handball a caution?".
Level is gained via meeting criteria and assessed against standards, which take time to learn and therefore be able to competantly demnstrate. And with time comes experience, therefore it would be taken that they "know better" than those less expereiced.
kids become adults, grow up an learn to become teachers and professors and experts in their field - but someone with a view from a different field / trade or train of thought can throw a curveball that floor them for an answer. The Professor is lost for words.....
I'm not seeing the difference between the two questions in this context?To clarify: the question is 'Is too much emphasis placed on referee levels?'
Not 'Are higher level referees better than lower level referees with more experience?'
What about me? Been a 6 for 16 years. What does that make me?There should be no such thing as an experienced level 6. You should only spend one season at 6 providing you don't get injured.
There should be no such thing as an experienced level 6. You should only spend one season at 6 providing you don't get injured.
What about me? Been a 6 for 16 years. What does that make me?
Do you want a reply to this question?What about me? Been a 6 for 16 years. What does that make me?