Am I just seeing something wrong or is the derby Keeper a good foot off his line for the first penalty (1:25)
I don’t think his rear foot can be, looking at later pens (Nunez he comes as far out and I’d say he’s off again but marginally)Rear foot at time of ball being struck..?
(Not bored enough to rewatch)
For me it's more of a case of thinking the laws don't apply to me and I apply what I think the laws should be.Dereliction of duty. Commentator called it straight away
It really bothers me that MO's at all levels of the game just blatantly ignore the rules or haven't got the spine to apply them
Well it causes of one simple thing in this league, money. And due to this the professional refs are told different.I watched a 16 year old AR call a less blatant violation during KFTM in a U19 boys State Cup final (this kid is absolutely going places as a referee, and he was worthy of this assignment). To watch a crew working a match with English professional teams ignore sanctioning this is just not good.
That clearly isn't right in this case, as with VAR it would have 100% been retaken.Well it causes of one simple thing in this league, money. And due to this the professional refs are told different.
Can't imagine that instruction would be given at the level at issue here. (I can imagine situations where I would give that instruction to very inexperienced ARs . . . )I don't agree with it, but for KFTPM some referees tell the AR ball over line only and leave encroachment to him (some also do it for penalties in open play which I agree with even less). That said, it was so blatant the referee should have seen it from where he was.
I've heard Football League referees say it, so only one level removed.Can't imagine that instruction would be given at the level at issue here. (I can imagine situations where I would give that instruction to very inexperienced ARs . . . )
Assuming that's not recently or, as stated above, its a dereliction of duty.I've heard Football League referees say it, so only one level removed.
About 8 years ago I think. The argument used is that on KFTPM the referee doesn't need to watch for penalty area encroachment, so he can focus on keeper encroachment. But in doing so he is indirectly saying that he doesn't trust his AR to rule on encroachment.Assuming that's not recently or, as stated above, its a dereliction of duty.
You use the phrase 'football expects' to justify a lot of things...this is ond thing that football fully expects (thanks to var)
About 8 years ago I think. The argument used is that on KFTPM the referee doesn't need to watch for penalty area encroachment, so he can focus on keeper encroachment. But in doing so he is indirectly saying that he doesn't trust his AR to rule on encroachment.
I think the standard currently is if you want a retake you tell me over comms and I'll decide.I've heard Football League referees say it, so only one level removed.
I think the standard currently is if you want a retake you tell me over comms and I'll decide.
We're all assuming AR hasn't told ref but they will be in constant dialogue.
Refs at our level now are still saying want it to be extremely clear, those stills aren't even a yard off the line. Offences all the same but within tolerance of most referees I am working with