Pass Back?

[CallumS]

examples of trickery
1. a player who deliberately flicks the ball with his feet up and heads, knees or chests the ball to his goalkeeper
2. a player who kneels down and deliberately pushes the ball to the goalkeeper with his knee
3. a player who lies down to deliberately heads a ball back to the goalkeeper during free kick
This things are uncommon but can happen in the game.

I'd love to see a player try this.

 

[MIP]

@CallumS This looks similar. I'd love to see it also

 

[SM]

lol steven taylor

 

[Brian Hamilton]

Everything is left at your own discretion as the match referee. The decision you take should be in accordance with the LOTG. From Law 1-18.

No it isn't. There are certain mandatory offences which have to be dealt with. Such as failing to respect the required distance at a restart or delaying the restart of play.

I'm calling you out MIP. I don't think you are a FIFA referee. I think you are someone adopting an online persona to troll this forum.

 

[MIP]

Everything is left at your own discretion as the match referee. The decision you take should be in accordance with the LOTG. From Law 1-18.

@Brian Hamilton The above quote is in relation to what we were discussing in this thread. It has nothing to do with restart or delaying restart.

 

[haywain]

I'm calling you out MIP. I don't think you are a FIFA referee. I think you are someone adopting an online persona to troll this forum.

so....what happens now

 

[MIP]

@haywain Another Phil Dowd in the forum hahaha. I'll hold my horses.

 

[CallumRushton13]

Well we've already got a 'Howard Webb'...

 

[HertsFinest]

Law 1-18? Interesting. Are FIFA keeping secret laws now?

 

[MIP]

Law 1-18? Interesting. Are FIFA keeping secret laws now?

FIFA LOTG are 17 laws. "The refereeing community across the world understands Law 18 as "common sense".

 

[HertsFinest]

FIFA LOTG are 17 laws. "The refereeing community across the world understands Law 18 as "common sense".

No, the refereeing community sees law 18 as "I don't want to apply the laws correctly so I'm going to pass off my inadequate refereeing and failure to apply laws 1-17 as Law 18."

 

[MIP]

No, the refereeing community sees law 18 as "I don't want to apply the laws correctly so I'm going to pass off my inadequate refereeing and failure to apply laws 1-17 as Law 18."

Do whatever you wish, it has nothing to do with me! At the end of the day, the assessors decides what they do with you.

 

[CallumRushton13]

No, the refereeing community sees law 18 as "I don't want to apply the laws correctly so I'm going to pass off my inadequate refereeing and failure to apply laws 1-17 as Law 18."

A hard referee is not always a good referee. That Is all

 

[MIP]

A hard referee is not always a good referee. That Is all

CORRECT

 

[haywain]

No, the refereeing community sees law 18 as "I don't want to apply the laws correctly so I'm going to pass off my inadequate refereeing and failure to apply laws 1-17 as Law 18."

not sure that's quite right, Herts

notice that you haven't picked up the o/p on his 'pass back' title

 

[SM]

Okay, enough fun and games. Let's get back on topic please.

 

[CallumRushton13]

Okay, enough fun and games. Let's get back on topic please.

Spoil sport

 

[SM]

I know. I used to love a good lively, gloves off, no holds barred, debate.

 

[CallumRushton13]

I know. I used to love a good lively, gloves off, no holds barred, debate.

Responsibility has changed you

 

[SM]

I know, haywain reminds me of that from time to time...