A shirt pull is never going to be by accident.
To be fair to the players, most of them probably think it's o.k. becsuse so many referees don't penalise it.
A shirt pull is never going to be by accident.
Is it?? So c1 Holding must be reckless to be a caution?? News to meIm sorry what? No of course not because that isnt what the LOTG says.
Its not a caution for every shirt pull unless its done in a reckless manner. If its in a careless manner its a DFK and no caution........
Applying the laws of the game correctly doesnt determine if you are hard or soft. So not really what I am saying at all.
Situation : freekick for red at 35yds, 9 blue who you already cautioned sooner in the game stands at 8yds of the ball and blocks it when the 4 red kicks it
Caution to 9, second yellow, you send him off ? That's the law right ?
Also consider the context of the game etc...
You often set walls at 35yds ?
That's exactly what I'm saying ans that's part of Law 18, Herts says basically that "The laws are the laws and those who discuss it sometimes are weak"
No, the refereeing community sees law 18 as "I don't want to apply the laws correctly so I'm going to pass off my inadequate refereeing and failure to apply laws 1-17 as Law 18."
I probably misunderstood this post
Discussing is brilliant. Saying "I applied law 18 and decided against dealing with that dissent" is not.
What about the situation I described ?